1. Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Leder RA, Nelson RC. Urolithiasis: detection and management with unenhanced spiral CT—a urologic perspective. Radiology 1998; 207:308-309.

2. Smith RC, Levine J, Rosenfeld AT. Helical CT of urinary tract stones. Epidemiology, origin, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Radiol Clin North Am 1999; 37:911-952.

3. Kenney PJ. CT evaluation of urinary lithiasis. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41:979-999.

4. Sandhu C, Anson KM, Patel U. Urinary tract stones—Part I: role of radiological imaging in diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Radiol 2003; 58:415-421.

5. Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 1995; 194:789-794.

6. Macintyre J. Roentgen rays: photography of renal calculus. Description of an adjustable modification in the focus tube. Lancet 1896; 2:118.

7. Herring LC. Observations on the analysis of ten thousand urinary calculi. J Urol 1962; 88:545-562.

8. Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 1997; 204:27-31.

9. Roth CS, Bowyer BA, Berquist TH. Utility of the plain abdominal radiograph for diagnosing ureteral calculi. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 14:311-315.

10. Mutgi A, Williams JW, Nettleman M. Renal colic. Utility of the plain abdominal roentgenogram. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151:1589-1592.

Orton GH. Some fallacies in the X-ray diagnosis of renal and ureteral calculi. BMJ 1908; 2:716-719.

Swick M. Darstellung der Niere und Harnwege im Röntgenbild durch intravenöse Einbringung eines neuren Kontrastoffes, des Uroselectans. Klin Wschr 1929; 8: 2087-2089.

Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR 1996; 166:97-101.

Fielding JR, Steele G, Fox LA, Heller H, Loughlin KR. Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography. J Urol 1997; 157:2071-2073.

Chen MYM, Zagoria RJ. Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic? J Emerg Med 1999; 17:299-303.

Niall O, Russell J, MacGregor R, Duncan H, Mullins J. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol 1999; 161:534-537.

Talner L, Vaughan M. Nonobstructive renal causes of flank pain: findings on non-contrast helical CT (CT KUB). Abdom Imaging 2003; 28:210-216. Luchs JS, Katz DS, Lane MJ, et al. Utility of hematuria testing in patients with suspected renal colic: correlation with unenhanced helical CT results. Urology 2002; 59:839-842. Jackman SV, Potter SR, Regan F, Jarrett TW. Plain abdominal X-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 2000; 164:308-310.

Sourtzis S, Thibeau JF, Damry N, et al. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unen-hanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR 1999; 172:1491-1494. Pfister SA, Deckart A, Laschke S, et al. Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:2513-2520. Gray Sears CL, Ward JF, Sears ST, et al. Prospective comparison of computerized tomography and excretory urography in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhema-turia. J Urol 2002; 168:2457-2460.

Catalano O, Nunziata A, Altei F, Siani A. Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. AJR 2002; 178:379-387.

Shokeir AA, Abdulmaaboud M. Prospective comparison of nonenhanced helical computerized tomography and Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of renal colic. J Urol 2001; 165:1082-1084.

Sudah M, Vanninen RL, Partanen K, et al. Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MR urography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 2002; 223:98-105. Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB Jr, Rubin GD, et al. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT. AJR 1995; 165: 509-513.

Chen MY, Zagoria RJ, Saunders HS, Dyer RB. Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic. AJR 1999; 173:1447-1450.

Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Goldman SM, Raval BK, Fishman EK. CT of renal inflammatory disease. Radiographics 1997; 17:851-866.

Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Ernst RD, et al. CT evaluation of renovascular disease. Radiographics 2000; 20:1321-1340.

Chu G, Rosenfield AT, Anderson K, Scout L, Smith RC. Sensitivity and value of digital CT scout radiography for detecting ureteral stones in patients with ureterolithiasis diagnosed on unenhanced CT. AJR 1999; 173:417-423.

Assi Z, Platt JF, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Korobkin M. Sensitivity of CT scout radiography and abdominal radiography for revealing ureteral calculi on helical CT: implications for radiologic follow-up. AJR 2000; 175:333-337.

32. Hartman RP, Kawashima A, King BF, LeRoy AJ, Vrtiska TJ. Sensitivity of original CT scanned projection radiographs (OCT-SPRs), new-enhanced CT scanned projection radiographs (ECT-SPRs), and film-screen radiographs (FSRs) for the detection of ureteral calculi. In: The Annual Meeting of the Society of Uroradiology, Cancun, Mexico, 2003.

33. Zagoria RJ, Khatod EG, Chen MY. Abdominal radiography after CT reveals urinary calculi: a method to predict usefulness of abdominal radiography on the basis of size and CT attenuation of calculi. AJR 2001; 176:1117-1122.

34. Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology 2002; 222:353-360.

35. Kawashima A, Vrtiska TJ, LeRoy AJ, et al. CT urography. Radiographics 2004; 24(suppl. 1):S35-S54.

36. Fielding JR, Silverman SG, Rubin GD. Helical CT of the urinary tract. AJR 1999; 172:1199-1206.

37. Smith RC, Verga M, Dalrymple N, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT. AJR 1996; 167:1109-1113.

38. Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings. AJR 1996; 166:1319-1322.

39. Boridy IC, Kawashima A, Goldman SM, Sandler CM. Acute ureterolithiasis: non-enhanced helical CT findings of perinephric edema for prediction of degree of ureteral obstruction. Radiology 1999; 213:663-667.

40. Bird VG, Gomez-Marin O, Leveillee RJ, et al. A comparison of unenhanced helical computerized tomography findings and renal obstruction determined by furosemide 99m technetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic scintirenography for patients with acute renal colic. J Urol 2002; 167:1597-1603.

41. Varanelli MJ, Coll DM, Levine JA, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC. Relationship between duration of pain and secondary signs of obstruction of the urinary tract on unenhanced helical CT. AJR 2001; 177:325-330.

42. Takahashi N, Kawashima A, Ernst RD, et al. Ureterolithiasis: can clinical outcome be predicted with unenhanced helical CT? Radiology 1998; 208:97-102.

43. Boulay I, Holtz P, Foley WD, White B, Begun FP. Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. AJR 1999; 172:1485-1490.

44. Fielding JR, Silverman SG, Samuel S, Zou KH, Loughlin KR. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment. AJR 1998; 171:1051-1053.

45. Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR 2002; 178: 101-103.

46. Olcott EW, Sommer FG, Napel S. Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: in vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography, and nephro-tomography. Radiology 1997; 204:19-25.

47. Nadler RB, Stern JA, Kimm S, Hoff F, Rademaker AW. Coronal imaging to assess urinary tract stone size. J Urol 2004; 172:962-964.

48. Georgiades CS, Moore CJ, Smith DP. Differences of renal parenchymal attenuation for acutely obstructed and unobstructed kidneys on unenhanced helical CT: a useful secondary sign? AJR 2001; 176:965-968.

49. Traubici J, Neitlich JD, Smith RC. Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral stones on routine unenhanced helical CT: is there a radiolucent center? AJR 17; 172:13-17.

50. Heneghan JP, Verga M, Dalrymple NC, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC. ''Rim sign'' in the diagnosis of ureteric calculi at unenhanced. CT. Radiology 1997; 202:709-711.

51. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Boridy IC, et al. Unenhanced helical CT of ureterolithiasis: value of the tissue rim sign. AJR 1997; 168:997-1000.

52. Bell TV, Fenlon HM, Davison BD, Ahari HK, Hussain S. Unenhanced helical CT criteria to differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths. Radiology 1998; 207:363-367.

Guest AR, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, et al. Assessment of the clinical utility of the rim and comet-tail signs in differentiating ureteral stones from phleboliths. AJR 2001; 177:1285-1291.

Boridy IC, Nikolaidis P, Kawashima A, Goldman SM, Sandler CM. Ureterolithiasis: value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 1999; 211:619-621.

Denton ER, Mackenzie A, Greenwell T, Popert R, Rankin SC. Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic—is the radiation dose justifiable? Clin Radiol 1999; 54:444-447. Homer JA, Davies-Payne DL, Peddinti BS. Randomized prospective comparison of non-contrast enhanced helical computed tomography and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of acute ureteric colic. Australas Radiol 2001; 45:285-290. Liu W, Esler SJ, Kenny BJ, et al. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. Radiology 2000; 215:51-54.

Spielmann AL, Heneghan JP, Lee LJ, Yoshizumi T, Nelson RC. Decreasing the radiation dose for renal stone CT: a feasibility study of single- and multi-detector CT. AJR 2002; 178:1058-1062.

Meagher T, Sukumar VP, Collingwood J, et al. Low dose computed tomography in suspected acute renal colic. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:873-876.

Hamm M, Knopfle E, Wartenberg S, et al. Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain. J Urol 2002; 167:1687-1691. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 2004; 233:649-657.

Boridy IC, Maklad N, Sandler CM. Suspected urolithiasis in pregnant women: imaging algorithm and literature review. AJR 1996; 167:869-875.

McCollough CH, Atwell TD, King BF, LeRoy AJ. Evaluation of renal colic during pregnancy: a comparison of radiation dose from radiographic and CT exams. In: The Annual Meeting of the Society of Uroradiology, Kauai, HI, 2000.

Tublin ME, Murphy ME, Delong DM, Tessler FN, Kliewer MA. Conspicuity of renal calculi at unenhanced CT: effects of calculus composition and size and CT technique. Radiology 2002; 225:91-96.

Guevara A, Springmann KE, Drach GW, Hillman BJ. Triamterene stones and computerized axial tomography. Urology 1986; 27:104-106.

Assimos DG, Langenstroer P, Leinbach RF, et al. Guaifenesin- and ephedrine-induced stones. J Endourol 1999; 13:665-667.

Liu CC, Li CC, Shih MC, Chou YH, Huang CH. Matrix stone. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27:810-813.

Blake SP, McNicholas MM, Raptopoulos V. Nonopaque crystal deposition causing ureteric obstruction in patients with HIV undergoing indinavir therapy [see comment]. AJR 1998; 171:717-720.

Bani Hani AH, Segura JW, LeRoy AJ. Urinary matrix calculi: our experience at a single institution. J Urol 2005; 173:120-123.

Williams JC Jr, Saw KC, Paterson RF, et al. Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2003; 61:1092-1096; discussion 1097.

Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B. Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 1998; 159:673-675. Williams JC Jr, Paterson RF, Kopecky KK, Lingeman JE, McAteer JA. High resolution detection of internal structure of renal calculi by helical computerized tomography. J Urol 2002; 167:322-326.

Zarse CA, McAteer JA, Tann M, et al. Helical computed tomography accurately reports urinary stone composition using attenuation values: in vitro verification using highresolution micro-computed tomography calibrated to Fourier transform infrared micro-spectroscopy. Urology 2004; 63:828-833.

74. Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, et al. Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 2000; 55:816-819.

75. Dretler SP, Spencer BA. CT and stone fragility. J Endourol 2001; 15:31-36.

76. Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W. Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 2001; 58:170-173.

77. Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA. Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 2003; 169:1679-1681.

78. Batchelar DL, Chun SS, Wollin TA, et al. Predicting urinary stone composition using X-ray coherent scatter: a novel technique with potential clinical applications. J Urol 2002; 168:260-265.

Was this article helpful?

0 0
10 Ways To Fight Off Cancer

10 Ways To Fight Off Cancer

Learning About 10 Ways Fight Off Cancer Can Have Amazing Benefits For Your Life The Best Tips On How To Keep This Killer At Bay Discovering that you or a loved one has cancer can be utterly terrifying. All the same, once you comprehend the causes of cancer and learn how to reverse those causes, you or your loved one may have more than a fighting chance of beating out cancer.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment