Efforts to Improve the Diagnosis and Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Panic Away

Panic Away End Anxiety and Panic Attacks

Get Instant Access

Michael J. ROY, MD, MPH1, and Patricia L. KRAUS. Division of Military Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Abstract. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a frequent and debilitating consequence of exposure to war and other life-threatening events. PTSD often goes undiagnosed and even when it is diagnosed; treatment is all too often inadequate or ineffective. It is imperative to identify more effective diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. We discuss currently available screening and treatment measures, and present approaches we are planning to try to improve each of these modalities.

Keywords: Posttraumatic stress disorder, combat stress, depression, pharmacotherapy, virtual reality, behavioral therapy

Introduction

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) became part of our lexicon in the aftermath of the Vietnam War, but the symptoms and associated functional impairment it represents have been known for centuries. Perhaps Cain was the first to suffer the torment of this disorder, and Homer certainly depicts its symptoms in his account of Achilles in The Iliad. More recently, the medical literature has featured hundreds of accounts from the American Civil War, both World Wars, and other national and international conflicts. Authors identify myriad physical and psychological symptoms that escape efforts to ascribe them to specific environmental factors, but are linked to the stress of war. PTSD is also well documented in many victims of terrorism, genocide and personal assaults such as rape. An estimated 10,000 Croatian Homeland War veterans (15% prevalence) have PTSD, with an alarmingly high suicide rate. The current conflict in Iraq, involving snipers and suicide bombings, as

Corresponding Author: LTC Michael Roy. Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, A3062, Bethesda, MD, 20814 USA. Telephone: (301) 295-9601; Fax: (301) 295-3557; Email: [email protected].

well as concerns about prisoner mistreatment, is a recipe for PTSD. This provides an opportunity to improve the care of combat veterans while defining optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

1. Psychological Effects of Traumatic Experiences

The first large study of American troops returning from duty in Iraq, conducted by Hoge et al., documented a rate of 12.9% meeting a strict case definition and 18% meeting a more broad definition of PTSD [1]. Subsequent evaluations of injured soldiers receiving care at Walter Reed Army Medical Center have indicated that initial screens may miss as many as 70% of those who meet criteria within 6 months, indicating both high rates and the need for repeated screening. Early experience with veterans of the Iraq conflict also underscores the high prevalence of other psychiatric disorders after all are common after such experiences, with nearly 30% of those surveyed by Hoge et al. meeting criteria for some mood or anxiety disorder. In addition, rates of alcohol and substance abuse have been found to be higher in individuals diagnosed with PTSD. In patients with PTSD, one national study identified a lifetime history of at least one other psychiatric disorder in 88% of men and 79% of women with PTSD [2], underscoring the importance of screening for more than just PTSD. The PRIME-MD is a particularly useful validated instrument that screens for depression, panic and other anxiety disorders, eating disorders, somatoform disorders, and alcoholism [3].

PTSD is not solely associated with war, but has also been identified as a common reaction to traumatic events ranging from personal assaults such as rape or mugging to life-threatening acute medical conditions. Briefly, PTSD is characterized by symptoms that can be divided into three categories, which persist for at least one month, following a threatening event that initially elicited fear, helplessness, or horror. The first category covers symptoms of re-experiencing the event, including intrusive thoughts, recurrent dreams, flashbacks, and physiologic changes induced by stimuli reminiscent of the event. The second category includes manifestations of avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma, such as avoiding activities, places, thoughts or feelings related in any way to the trauma, inability to recall an important aspect of the trauma, anhedonia, detachment from others, restricted range of affect, and a sense of a foreshortened future. The final category incorporates symptoms of increased arousal, such as insomnia, irritability, impaired concentration, hyper-vigilance, and an exaggerated startle response. In the general population, while a history of some traumatic exposure is more likely than not, PTSD has an estimated point prevalence of 2-5%, a lifetime prevalence of 8-12% and higher yet in combat veterans [2, 4-12]. The current environment in Iraq is likely to result in particularly high rates of PTSD. It often goes undiagnosed for months or years; consequently effective treatment is not provided. PTSD is associated with high rates of depression and other psychological conditions, poorer physical health, missing work, impaired function at work and at home, and significantly higher healthcare costs. Rapid diagnosis could enhance individual function and military readiness. PTSD is associated with increased somatic complaints, making it even more likely that someone with PTSD

will seek the help of their primary care physician, so that the prevalence of PTSD in primary care is undoubtedly significantly higher than in the general population. Recent studies in primary care found that 9-12% of patients met criteria for PTSD [7-8]. Samson et al. identified PTSD in 38.6% of patients who were referred by their primary care providers for mental health services based on suspicion of depression or anxiety [7]. However, like most mental disorders, PTSD often goes undiagnosed in primary care, and such patients are frequently not referred to mental health. Several studies have examined the likelihood of developing PTSD after a traumatic event, and estimates that combine all stressors range from 9.2% to 25% [2, 8-10, 12]. Terrorist events have been shown to result in markedly elevated rates of PTSD. After terrorists released the nerve agent sarin in a Tokyo subway, 60% of those who presented for medical care after the incident had symptoms of PTSD that persisted at least 6 months, even though most did not have evidence of physical exposure to sarin [13]. In fact, PTSD not uncommonly results in those not directly exposed to the event, as evidenced by the 7.5% of Manhattan residents (including 20% of those living near the World Trade Center) meeting criteria for PTSD 5-8 weeks after September 11, 2001[14]. Moreover, 44% of adults outside of New York City reported substantial symptoms of distress 3-5 days after 9/11/01 [15]. Wartime deployment is also associated with high rates of PTSD—we identified PTSD in 83 of 651 (12.7%) veterans of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm, upon completion of evaluation at Walter Reed Army Medical Center 4-6 years after their deployment, consistent with other reports [16-17]. PTSD is in turn associated with noticeably higher rates of depression and other psychological conditions, poorer physical health, missing work, impaired function at work and at home, and significantly higher healthcare costs [18-21]. Subthreshold PTSD, represented by the multiple symptoms but failure to meet strict criteria for the full disorder, has been reported to have at least an equal, if not greater, prevalence compared to full PTSD, and has also been shown to be associated with significant disability [6,11].

2. Screening Instruments

2.1 A model: The PHQ-9 for Depression

The under-diagnosis, comorbidities, somatic complaints, functional impairment, and health care utilization described for PTSD are also characteristic of depression. The PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) is a 9-item screen for depression that has been validated in 3000 primary care and 3000 obstetrics and gynecology patients [22]. The PHQ-9, included in Appendix B, consists of nine questions taken directly from the DSM-IV criteria for major depression. A score is given for each of the 9 responses, based upon whether the symptom bothered the individual not at all (0), for several days (1), more than half the days (2), or nearly every day (3), in recent weeks. A composite score can then be generated, with a range from 0 to 27; the scores have been shown to correlate with the severity of depression, as well as the frequency of physician visits, and measures of functional status. The PHQ-9 has been shown to identify about twice as many cases as primary care physicians were able to diagnose on their own. Using a cut-off score of 10 to diagnose depression, the PHQ-9 has a sensitivity and specificity of 88% each [22]. The scores can be used not only to make an initial diagnosis of depression, but also, upon re-administration of the questionnaire, to monitor the response to therapy, to determine whether an individual patient is satisfactorily responding to treatment or not. In this way, the PHQ-9 provides an invaluable tool for the primary care physician, who has long had effective monitoring measures for other chronic diseases that are frequently encountered: hypertension (blood pressure cuff), diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1C), and hyperlipidemia (LDL). Prior to the PHQ-9, there was not such an instrument for depression, rendering diagnosis more difficult, with numerous studies indicating that depression was missed about half the time in a primary care setting.

The PHQ-9 fulfills ideal criteria for a screening instrument. It is quick, inexpensive, easy to administer, is well validated, with relatively high accuracy, can educate patients in providers with regard to criteria for the diagnosis, can be used to follow progress over time, and there is also some evidence that its use is associated with improved prognosis.

2.2 Existing screens for PTSD

Numerous screens for PTSD have been previously developed. However, most are complex and time-consuming. A previous review of available instruments found that nearly all did not have well-established validity and reliability. Of those with some evidence of validity, it has generally not been demonstrated across both combat veteran and civilian populations. Since the time of that review, two instruments have become popular. The first is the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), which is 17 pages long, must be administered by a professional, and features detailed instructions and complex scoring [23]. The CAPS has become the gold standard instrument for the diagnosis of PTSD in the research setting, with a recent review confirming strong validity and documenting its use in more than 200 studies [24]. However, it is not a practical instrument for use in a high-volume, rapid turnover setting, whether the primary care physician's office, or with combat veterans returning from deployment and eager to be reunited with their families. Efforts to use the CAPS to follow response to treatment have also proven more problematic [25]. The other widely used instrument is the PTSD Checklist (PCL), a 17-item screen, which can be self-administered, having the advantages of rapid completion, little expenditure of professional time in administration, and relatively simple scoring. Although it compared favorably with the CAPS for initial diagnosis of PTSD in combat veterans, it was less effective in assessing response to treatment [26]. Unfortunately, it also fared poorly in the only study to assess its utility in primary care, with a sensitivity of 32% [7], and while using a lower threshold score would improve the sensitivity, the PCL still may not be very useful to primary care physicians trying to diagnose this enigmatic condition. Since our experience with the PHQ-9 at Walter Reed has been overwhelmingly positive, as a site for its initial validation as well as a site where it is used on a regular basis to screen primary care patients, we chose to develop a PTSD screen patterned after the PHQ-9. Like the PHQ-9, it is comprised of questions taken directly from DSM-IV criteria for the disorder being screened for, and each is then scored on a scale from 0-3 based on the self-reported frequency of the feature. We seek to compare the efficacy of this instrument, as well as other available brief screens, in comparison to the more cumbersome, but gold-standard, CAPS. Since it has twelve questions, we have given our new instrument the appellation of PTSD-12.

3. Treatment of PTSD

Over the past decade, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as sertraline, fluoxetine and paroxetine have been shown to be superior to placebo in the treatment of PTSD [27-28], as well as in preventing relapse if they are continued after achieving a clinical response [29]. SSRIs improve the quality of life of those with PTSD in multiple domains, improve functional status, decrease symptom severity, and reduce vulnerability to stress. In addition, non-pharmacologic therapies such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and exposure therapy have also shown efficacy, and probably have a greater duration of response in the absence of ongoing treatment [30-32]. CBT corrects irrational beliefs and thoughts and promotes rational behavioral changes, while exposure therapy helps individuals to confront stimuli associated with their traumatic experience through progressively more intense exposure, to identify and neutralize behavioral cues. Exposure therapy appears to be most useful when employed within the context of CBT. A recent Cochrane review demonstrated that CBT/exposure therapy had clear superiority over usual care and other psychological therapies such as supportive therapy and psychodynamic therapy [33]. While the identification of effective therapies for PTSD is good news, the downside is that sizeable numbers of those with PTSD have an inadequate response. Overall, it appears that pharmacotherapy results have a response rate of 40-60%, and non-pharmacologic approaches are not appreciably better.

We postulate that a combination of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies should prove superior to either alone. This hypothesis has not yet been adequately tested, and it is important to do so, as the possibility that one form of therapy might interfere with the other can not be rejected out of hand. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or some other objective measure of the effect on neural pathways might be a particularly valuable measure to incorporate in such studies, to assess the interaction, if any, between the two different approaches.

Virtual reality (VR) is a form of exposure therapy with particularly high potential. In recent years, virtual reality technology has been utilized to help patients overcome phobias (e.g., claustrophobia [34], fear of flying [35], fear of heights [36], fear of spiders [37-38], and fear of driving after an automobile accident [39] ), as well as for anxiety disorders [40] and PTSD. In the latter case, small numbers of Vietnam War veterans [41] and World Trade Center survivors [42-43] have each been reported to improve through the use of progressively more realistic and intense virtual reality exposures. Imaginal exposure therapy has been found to be effective in multiple clinical trials, and expert consensus treatment guidelines published in 2000 characterized it as the non-pharmacologic treatment of choice [44], but it is only recently that technology has reached the point where virtual reality has reached sufficient quality to make it a realistic manner of administering this form of therapy.

While both exposure therapy and pharmacotherapy are effective treatment for PTSD, there are still significant numbers of patients who will not respond to one or the other. No study has previously examined both types of therapy combined, but given the diversity of the alternatives, it is reasonable to consider that combination therapy may result in a higher response rate than either therapy alone. On the other hand, the fact that each form of therapy has demonstrated superiority to placebo makes it unethical to include a pure placebo arm. Prior studies with both pharmacotherapy and desensitization therapy suggest that patients with PTSD are more sensitive than those with other psychiatric disorders, so that medication should be started at a low dose and gradually increased. Starting with too high a dose, even though such a starting dose might be appropriate for a condition such as depression, may exacerbate anxiety and lead to discontinuation of the therapy. Similarly, desensitization is most likely to be successful if started slowly, with most of the successful studies taking this approach; however, there is less experience with desensitization, and some believe efficacy may be greater with relatively intense exposure early in the course of treatment.

We have assembled an experienced team of experts on both sides of the Atlantic to conduct a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of combined pharmacotherapy and CBT/VR exposure therapy vs. mono-therapy. The study will be carried out at both Uniformed Services University in the Washington, DC area, and the University of Zagreb in Croatia, in order to facilitate treatment of both recent American veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan theaters, as well as veterans of the Croatian Homeland war with PTSD of longer duration. Inclusion of the diverse study populations will facilitate generalizability of results.

4. Summary

In a relatively short period of time, PTSD has been clearly identified and delineated, and effective treatment has been established. Simple approaches may improve diagnostic rates, and new technologies have the potential to significantly enhance the efficacy of treatment further. In an increasingly complex world, the likelihood of exposure to life-threatening disasters is greater than ever, and medical science must keep pace.

References

[1] Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Fourth Edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

[2] Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:1048-60.

[3] Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, and the Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care Study Group. Validation and Utility of a Self-report Version of PRIME-MD. JAMA 1999;282:1737-44.

[4] Davidson JRT, Hughes D, Blazer D, George LK. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the community: an epidemiological study. Psychol Med 1991;21:1-19.

[5] Resnick HS, Kilpatrick DG, Dansky BS, Saunders BE, Best CL. Prevalence of civilian trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a representative national sample of women. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993;61:984-91.

[6] Stein MB, Walker JR, Hazen AL, Forde DR. Full and partial posttraumatic stress disorder: findings from a community survey.

[7] Samson AY, Bensen S, Beck A, Price D, Nimmer C. Posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care. J Fam Pract 1999;48:222-7.

[8] Stein MB, McQuaid JR, Pedrelli P, Lenox R, McCahill ME. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the primary care medical setting. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000;22:261-9.

[9] Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P, Peterson E. Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder in an urban population of young adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991;48:216-22.

[10] Breslau N, Kessler R, Chilcoat RC, Schultz LR Davis GC, Andreski P. Trauma and posttraumatic disorder in the community: the 1996 Detroit area survey of trauma. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:626-32.

[11] Davidson JRT, Tharwani HM, Connor KM. Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS): normative scores in the general population and effect sizes in placebo-controlled SSRI trials. Depress Anxiety 2002;15:75-8.

[12] Hidalgo RB, Davidson JRT. Posttraumatic stress disorder: epidemiology and health-related considerations. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:5-13.

[13] Ohbu S, Yamashina A, Takasu N, et al. Sarin poisoning on Tokyo subway. Southern Med J 1997;90:587-593.

[14] Galea S, Ahern J, Resnick H, Kilpatrick D, Bucuvalas M, Gold J, Vlahov D. Psychologic sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. N Engl J Med 2002;346:982-7.

[15] Schuster MA, Stein BD, Jaycox LH, et al. A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. N Engl J Med 2001;3435:1507-112.

[16] Wolfe J. Women veterans: updates and trends. National Center for PTSD Clinical Quarterly. 1(2):9-10.

[17] Frueh BC, Elhai JD, Gold PB, Monnier J, Magruder KM, Keane TM, Arana GW. Disability compensation seeking among veterans evaluated for posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatric Services 2003;54:84-91.

[18] Ullman SE, Siegel JM. Traumatic events and physical health in a community sample. J Trauma Stress 1996;9:703-20.

[19] Kessler RC. Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61(Suppl 5):4-14.

[20] Wagner AW, Wolfe J, Rotnitsky A, Proctor SP, Erickson DJ. An investigation of the impact of posttraumatic stress disorder on physical health. J Traum Stress 2000;13:41-55.

[21] Walker EA, Katon W, Russo J, Ciechanowski P, Newman E, Wagner AW. Health care costs associated with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:369-74.

[22] Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. JGIM 2001;16:601-13.

[23] Blake DD, Weathers FW, Nagy LM, Kaloupek DG, Gusman FD, Charney DS, Keane TM. The development of a clinician-administered PTSD scale. J Trauma Stress 1995;8:75-90.

[24] Weathers FW, Keane TM, Davidson JR. Clinician-administered PTSD scale: a review of the first ten years. Depress Anxiety 2001;13:132-56.

[25] Betemps EJ, Smith RM, Baker DG, Rounds-Kugler BA. Measurement precision of the clinician-administered PTSD scale (CAPS): a RASCH model analysis. J Appl Meas 2003;4:59-69.

[26] Forbes D, Creamer M, Biddle D. The validity of the PTSD checklist as a measure of symptomatic change in combat-related PTSD. Behavior Res Ther 2001;39:977-86.

[27] Davidson JRT, Rothbaum BO, van der Kolk BA, Sikes CR, Farfel GM. Multicenter, double-blind comparison of sertraline and placebo in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:485-92.

[28] Marshall RD, Beebe K, Oldham M, Zaninelli R. Efficacy and safety of paroxetine treatment for chronic PTSD: a fixed-dose, placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1982-8.

[29] Davidson JRT, Pearlstein T, Londborg P, Brady KT, Rothbaum B, Bell J, Maddock R, Hegel MT, Farfel G. Efficacy of sertraline in preventing relapse of posttraumatic stress disorder: results of a 28-week doubleblind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1974-81.

[30] Foa EB. Psychosocial treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61(Suppl 5):43-8.

[31] Resnick PA, Nishith P, Weaver TL, Astin MC, Feuer CA. A comparison of cognitive-processing therapy with prolonged exposure and a waiting condition for the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in female rape victims. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70:867-79.

[32] Rothbaum BO, Schwartz AC. Exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychother 2002;56:59-75.

[33] Bisson J, Andrew M. Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database

Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003388.

[34] Botella C, Banos RM, Perpina C, Villa H, Alcaniz M, Rey A. Virtual reality treatment of claustrophobia: a case report. Behav Res Ther 2002;36:239-46.

[35] Rothbaum BO, Hodges L, Smith S, Lee JH, Price L. A controlled study of virtual reality exposure therapy for the fear of flying. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:1020-6.

[36] Emmelkamp PM, Bruynzeel M, Drost L, van der Mast CA. Virtual reality treatment in acrophobia: a comparison with exposure in vivo. Cyberpsychol Behav 2001;4:335-9.

[37] Carlin AS, Hoffman HG, Weghorst S. Virtual reality and tactile augmentation in the treatment of spider phobia: a case report. Behav Res Ther 1997;35:153-8.

[38] Garcia-Palacios A, Hoffman H, Carlin A, Furness TA, Botella C. Virtual reality in the treatment of spider phobia: a controlled study. Behav Res Ther 2002;40:983-93.

[39] Walshe DG, Lewis EJ, Kim SI, O'Sullivan K, Wiederhold BK. Exploring the use of computer games and virtual reality in exposure therapy for fear of driving following a motor vehicle accident. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003;6:329-34.

[40] Rothbaum BO, Hodges LF. The use of virtual reality exposure in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Behav Modif 1999;23:507-25.

[41] Rothbaum BO, Hodges LF, Ready D, Graap K, Alarcon RD. Virtual reality exposure therapy for Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62:617-22.

[42] Difede J, Hoffman H, Jaysinghe N. Innovative use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of PTSD in the aftermath of September 11. Psychiatr Serv 2002;53:1083-5.

[43] Difede J, Hoffman HG. Virtual reality exposure therapy for World Trade Center posttraumatic stress disorder: a case report. Cyberpsychol Behav 2002;5:529-35.

[44] Ballenger JC, Davidson JR, Lecrubier Y, Nutt DJ, Foa EB, Kessler RC, McFarlane AC, Shalev AY. Consensus statement on posttraumatic stress disorder from the International Consensus Group on Depression and Anxiety. J clin Psychiatry 2000;61:60-6.

Novel Approaches to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder 67

© 2006 IOS Press. All rights reserved.

Was this article helpful?

0 0
Do Not Panic

Do Not Panic

This guide Don't Panic has tips and additional information on what you should do when you are experiencing an anxiety or panic attack. With so much going on in the world today with taking care of your family, working full time, dealing with office politics and other things, you could experience a serious meltdown. All of these things could at one point cause you to stress out and snap.

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment