Morton neuroma. a Transverse 12-5MHz US image obtained over the plantar aspect of the meta-tarsal heads with T1-weighted MR imaging correlation (b) demonstrates a solid hypoechoic mass (arrows) consistent with a Morton neuroma between the third and fourth metatarsals (M).c Surgical specimen trr|i>ti|i f 3B 39 .

Morton neuroma. a Transverse 12-5MHz US image obtained over the plantar aspect of the meta-tarsal heads with T1-weighted MR imaging correlation (b) demonstrates a solid hypoechoic mass (arrows) consistent with a Morton neuroma between the third and fourth metatarsals (M).c Surgical specimen and lead to development of a fusiform hypoechoic mass elongated along the major axis of the metatarsals [80-82]. US has a reported 95-100% sensitivity, 83% specificity and 95% accuracy in the diagnosis of Morton neuromas [83]. Longitudinal scans may demonstrate the continuity of the mass with the interdigital nerve. Missing neuromas are related to suboptimal experience of the examiner and to the small size of the lesion. The coexistence of an enlarged intermetatarsal bursa can explain the mixed or anechoic appearance of some lesions and their extension dorsal to the plantar aspect of metatarsals [83].

4.6 Dermis and hypodermis

Assessment of skin and subcutaneous tissue is possible using high frequency transducers (up to 30 MHz), that are able to differentiate skin from subcutaneous tissue. Specific skin disease is usually diagnosed by clinical examination sometimes followed by skin biopsy.

Currently US has no role in the diagnosis of skin lesions but can be very helpful in assessing and following up several systemic pathologies with cutaneous involvement.

In dermatopolymyositis, cutaneous lesions can be easily found; for example the characteristic Got-tron's papule, erythematous or violaceous plaques,

Transverse US scan depicting an inhomogeneously hypere-choic nodular mass (arrows) related to a superficial lipoma, which is located within subcutaneous tissue of elbow slightly thickened over bony eminences, often detected on the extensor aspect of fingers joints. With US they appear as small nodular iso-hypere-choic areas with characteristic calcification if the disease occurs in childhood. Involvement of adipose tissue is observed as moderate thickening that appears as a homogeneous hyperechoic line affecting of the fibrous connective tissue bands that lose their linear architecture [84].

On US, liposclerosis is characterized by hypoechoic micro- and macronodules of fibrous tissue that progressively replace the subcutaneous tissue.

Rheumatic nodules have a hypoechoic appearance with smooth margins and can be sometimes mistaken for gout tophi; the incidental finding of cal-cific intralesional foci (hyperechoic with posterior acoustic shadow) makes the diagnosis easier [85].

In systemic sclerosis, sclero-atrophic hypo-iso-echoic alteration of the subcutaneous tissue can be seen, especially in the finger-tips.

Subcutaneous edema is characterized by a large-mesh hypoechoic net with a characteristic 'cobblestone' appearance.

Panniculitis is an inflammatory phenomenon of the subcutaneous tissue with a probable vas-culitic origin. It can be divided into lobular and septal panniculitis and appear as hypo-hyperechoic inhomogeneous areas, rich in calcific nodules of various dimensions (1 cm up to 15 cm in erythema nodosus). Moreover, in the acute phases, marked surrounding edema and thickening of the septa can be seen.

Lipomas and angiomas are common findings and are characterized by specific US vascular pattern [14,15,86] (Figs. 4.71,4.72 a, b).

There are several pathologies - less important but not less common - involving the overloaded fat pads in specific anatomical sites, such as the fibro-adipose subcalcanear sole, that may be affected in overload syndromes that involve the nearby plantar fascia (Fig. 4.73).

Plantar fibromatosis (Ledderhose disease) is a pathological condition characterized by nodulari-ty along the aponeurosis course which appears homogeneously hypoechoic (Fig. 4.74 a, b) and shows no vascular signals at color and power Doppler analysis [87].

A similar condition, sometimes connected with plantar fibromatosis, is Dupuytren's contracture, in which the hypoechoic nodules are found in longitudinal bundles of the palmar fascia along the course of the flexor tendons [88].

Fig. 4.72 a, b

a Hypoechoic,ovoid,well-defined mass typical of an angioma.bThe corresponding power Doppler scan shows the typical vascular pattern with a single pedicle


Plantar fascitis. Inhomogeneous appearance of subcutaneous planes (arrows)


Fig. 4.74 a, b

a Plantar side of foot, longitudinal US scan. A hypoechoic subcutaneous nodule (*) is found adjacent to the plantar fascia.b MR sagittal scan of the same patient confirming the finding (*). FP = plantar fascia


1. Grassi W, Cervini C (1998) Ultrasonography in rheumatology: an evolving technique.Ann Rheum Dis 57:268-271

2. Grassi W, Filippucci E, Farina A (2005) Ultrasonography in osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 34:19-23

3. Grassi W, Tittarelli E, Pirani O et al (1993) Ultrasound examination of metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 22:243-247

4. Grassi W,Lamanna G, Farina A, Cervini C (1999) Sono-graphic imaging of normal and osteoarthritic cartilage. Semin Arthritis Rheum 28:398-403

5. Grassi W, Salaffi F, Filippucci E (2005) Ultrasound in rheumatology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:467-485

6. Aisen AM, McCune WJ, MacGuire A et al (1984) Sonographic evaluation of the cartilage of the knee. Radiology 102:781-784

7. McCune WJ, Dedrock DK, Aisen AM, MacGuire A (1990) Sonographic evaluation of osteoarthritic femoral condylar cartilage. Correlation with operative findings. Clin Orthop 254:230-235

8. Grassi W, Tittarelli E, Cervini C (1993) L'ecotomogra-fia nella gonartrosi. Il Reumatologo 14:22-26

9. Richardson ML,Selby B, Montana MA,Mack LA (1988) Ultrasonography of the knee. Radiol Clin North Am 26:63-75

10. Iagnocco A, Coari G, Zoppini A (1992) Sonographic evaluation of femoral condylar cartilage in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 21:201-203

11. Grassi W, Filippucci E, Busilacchi P (2004) Musculoskeletal ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 18:813-826

12. Martino F,Monetti G (1993) Semeiotica ecografica delle malattie reumatiche. Piccin ed., Padova

13. Frediani B, Filippou G, Falsetti P et al (2005) Diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease: ultrasonographic criteria proposed. Ann Rheum Dis 64:638-640

14. Van Holsbeeck MT,Introcaso JH (2001) Musculoskele-tal ultrasound, 2nd edition, Mosby

15. Gibbon WW,Wakefield RJ (1999) Ultrasound in inflammatory disease. Radiol Clin North Am 37:633-651

16. Gibbon WW (2004) Applications of ultrasound in arthritis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 8:313-328

17. Newman JS, Adler R, Bude RO, Rubin J (1994) Detection of soft-tissue hyperemia: value of power Doppler sonography. AJR 163:385-389

18. Silvestri E, Martinoli C, Onetto F et al (1994) Valuta-zione dell'artrite reumatoide del ginocchio con color Doppler. Radiol Med 88:364-367

19. Carotti M, Salaffi F, Manganelli P et al (2002) Power Doppler sonography in the assessment of synovial tissue of the knee joint in reumathoid arthritis: a preliminary experience. Ann Rheum Dis 61:877-882

20. Schmidt WA,Volker L,Zacher J et al (2000) Colour Dop-pler ultrasonography to detect pannus in kneejoint synovitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 18:439-444

21. Fitzgerald O, Bresnihan B (1992) Synovial vascularity is increased in rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the article by Stivens et al (letter).Arthritis Rheum 35:1540-1541

22. Walsh DA (1999) Angiogenesis and arthritis. Rheumatology 38:103-112

23. Klauser A, Frauscher F, Schirmer M et al (2002) The value of contrast enhanced color Doppler ultrasound in the detection of vascularization of finger joint in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 46:647-653

24. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C et al (2000) contrast enhanced power Doppler ultrasound examination of metacarpophalangeal joints in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 59 (Suppl 1)

25. Klauser A, Demharten J, De Marchi A et al (2005) Contrast enhanced gray-scale sonography in assessment of joint vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis: result from the IACUS study group. Eur Radiol 15:2404-2410

26. Martino F, Angelelli G, Ettorre GC et al (1992) Aspetto normale della borsa sovrarotulea nell'ecografia del ginocchio. Radiol Med 83:43-48

27. Van Holsbeeck M, Strouse PJ (1993) Sonography of the shoulder: evaluation of the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa. AJR 160:561-564

28. Fornage BD, Schernberg FL, Rifkin MD (1985) Ultrasound examination of the hand. Radiology 155:785-788

29. Steiner E, Steinbach LS, Schnarkowski P et al (1996) Ganglia and cysts around joints. Radiol Clin North Am 34:395-425

30. De Flaviis L, Musso MG (1995) Hand and wrist. Clin Diagn Ultrasound 30:151-178

31. Cardinal E, Buckwalter KA, Braunstein EM, Mih AD (1994) Occult dorsal carpal ganglion: comparison of US and MR imaging. Radiology 193:259-262

32. Teefey SA,Middleton WD, Patel V et al (2004) The accuracy of high-resolution ultrasound for evaluating focal lesions of the hand and wrist. J Hand Surg 29:393-399

33. Bianchi S,Martinoli C (1999) Detection of loose bodies in joints. Radiol Clin North Am 37:679-690

34. Roberts D, Miller TT, Erlanger SM (2004) Sonographic appearance of primary synovial chondromatosis of the knee. J Ultrasound Med 23:707-709

35. Puddu G,Ippolito E, Postacchini F (1976) A classification of Achilles tendon disease. Am J Sports Med 4:145-150

36. Garlaschi G,Silvestri E, Satragno L,Cimmino MA (2002) The rheumatoid hand: diagnostic imaging. Springer, Milano

37. Bianchi S,Martinoli C,Abdelwhab IF (2005) Ultrasound of tendon tears. Part 1: general considerations and upper extremity. Skeletal Radiol 34:500-512

38. Bianchi S, Poletti, PA, Martinoli C (2006) Ultrasound appearance of tendon tears. Part 2: lower extremity and myotendinous tears. Skeletal Radiol 35:63-77

39. Fredberg U, Bolvig L (2002) Significance of ultrasono-graphically detected asymptomatic tendinosis in the patellar and achilles tendons.Am J Sports Med 30:488-491

40. Maganaris CN,Narici MV,Almekinders LC (2004) Biomechanics and pathophysiology of overuse tendon injuries: ideas on insertional tendinopathy. Sports Med 34:1005-1017

41. Clement JP 4th,Kassarjian A, Palmer WE (2005) Synovial inflammatory processes in the hand. Eur J Radiol 56:307-318

42. Simmen BR, Gschwend N (1995) Tendon diseases in chronic rheumatoid arthritis Orthopade 24:224-236

43. Small LN, Ross JJ (2005) Suppurative tenosynovitis and septic bursitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 19:991-1005

44. Grassi W, Tittarelli E, Pirani O et al (1995) Finger tendon involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation with high-frequency sonography. Arthritis Rheum 38:186-194

45. Nagaoka M, Matsuzaki H, Suzuki T (2000) Ultrasonographic examination of de Quervain's disease. J Orthop Sci 5:96-99

46. Giovagnorio F, Andreoli C, De Cicco ML. Ultrasonographic evaluation of de Quervain disease. J Ultrasound Med, Vol 16, Issue 10:685-689

47. Silvestri E, Biggi E, Molfetta L et al (2003) Power Doppler analysis of tendon vascularization. Int J Tissue React 25:149-158

48. Richards PJ, Win T, Jones PW (2005) The distribution of microvascular response in Achilles tendonopathy assessed by colour and power Doppler. Skeletal Radiol 34:336-342

49. Martinoli C,Derchi LE,Pastorino C et al (1993) Analysis of echotexture of tendons with US. Radiology 186:839-843

50. Ulreich N, Kainberger F, Huber W, Nehrer S (2002) Achilles tendon and sports. Radiologe 42:811-817

51. Lohrer H, Arentz S (2003) Impingement lesion of the distal anterior Achilles tendon in sub-Achilles bursitis and Haglund-pseudoexostosis-a therapeutic challenge Sportverletz Sportschaden 17:181-188

52. Terslev L, Qvistgaard E, Torp-Pedersen S et al (2001) Ultrasound and Power Doppler findings in jumper's knee - preliminary observations. Eur J Ultrasound 13:183-189

53. De Flaviis L,Nessi R,Scaglione P et al (1989) Ultrasonic diagnosis of Osgood-Schlatter and Sinding-Larsen-Johansson diseases of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 18:193-197

54. Mahlfeld K, Kayser R, Franke J, Merk H (2001) Ultrasonography of the Osgood-Schlatter disease. Ultraschall Med 22:182-185

55. Bianchi S, Cohen M, Jacob D (2005) Tendons traumatic lesions. J Radiol 86(12 Pt 2):1845-1857

56. Bouffard JA, Lee SM, Dhanju J (2000) Ultrasonography of the shoulder. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21:164-191

57. Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Yamaguchi K (2004) Sono-graphy of the rotator cuff: analysis of interobserver variability. AJR 183:1465-1468

58. Teefey SA, Middleton WD,Yamaguchi K (1999) Shoulder sonography: state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am 37:767-785

59. Ptasznik R (1997) Sonography of the shoulder. In: van Holsbeeck MT, Introcaso JH (eds) Musculoskeletal ultrasound. Saunders, St. Louis, pp 463-516

60. Werner A, Mueller T, Boehm D, Gohlke F (2000) The stabilizing sling for the long head of the biceps tendon in the rotator cuff interval: a histoanatomic study. Am J Sports Med 28:28-31

61. Farin PU, Jaroma H, Harju A, Soimakallio S (1995) Medial displacement of the biceps brachii tendon: evaluation with dynamic sonography during maximal external shoulder rotation. Radiology 195:845-848

62. Patton WC, McCluskey GM (2001) Biceps tendinitis and subluxation. Clin Sports Med 20:505-529

63. Ptasznik R, Hennesy O (1995) Abnormalities of the biceps tendon of the shoulder: sonographic findings. AJR 164:409-414

64. Prato N, Derchi LE, Martinoli C (1996) Sonographic diagnosis of biceps tendon dislocation. Clin Radiol 51:737-739

65. Neustadter J,Raikin SM,Nazarian LN (2004) Dynamic sonographic evaluation of peroneal tendon subluxa-tion.AJR 183:985-988

66. Bianchi S, Martinoli C, Gaignot C et al (2005) Ultrasound of the ankle: anatomy of the tendons, bursae, and ligaments. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 9:243-259

67. Chau CL, Griffith JF (2005) Musculoskeletal infections: ultrasound appearances. Clin Radiol 60:149-159

68. Bureau NJ, Chhem RK, Cardinal E (1999) Musculoskeletal infections: US manifestations.Radiographics 19:1585-1592

69. Okayama A, Futani H, Kyo F et al (2003) Usefulness of ultrasonography for early recurrent myositis ossificans. J Orthop Sci 8:239-242

70. Park A, Lehnerdt G, Lautermann J (2006) Myositis of the sternocleidomastoid muscle as a result of arthritis of the sternoclavicular joint. Laryngorhinootologie. Epub ahead of print

71. De Marchi A, De Petro P, Linari A et al (2002) Preliminary experience in the study of soft tissue superficial masses. Color-Doppler US and wash-in and wash-out curves with contrast media compared to histological result. Radiol Med 104:451-458

72. De Marchi A, De Petro P, Faletti C et al (2003) Echoco-lor power Doppler with contrast medium to evaluate vascularization in lesions of the soft tissues of the limbs. Chir Organi Mov 88:225-231

73. Melis M,Marongiu L, Scintu F et al (2002) Primary hydatid cysts of psoas muscle. ANZ J Surg 72:443-445

74. Peetrons P (2002) Ultrasound of muscles. Eur Radiol 12:35-43

75. Newman JS,Adler RS, Bude RO, Rubin JM (1994) Detection of soft-tissue hyperemia: value of power Doppler sonography. AJR 163:385-389

76. Krix M, Weber MA, Krakowski-Roosen H et al (2005) Assessment of skeletal muscle perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 24:431-441

77. Hammer HB, Hovden IA, Haavardsholm EA et al (2005) Ultrasonography shows increased cross-sectional area of the median nerve in patients with arthritis and carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatology (in press)

78. Beekman R, Visser LH (2004) High-resolution sono-graphy of the peripheral nervous system: a review of the literature. Eur J Neurology 11:305-314

79. Ziswiler HR, Reichenbach S,Vögelin E et al (2005) Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 52:304-311

80. Redd RA, Peters VJ, Emery SF et al (1989) Morton neuroma: sonographic evaluation. Radiology 171:415-417

81. Read JW, Noakes JB, Kerr D et al (1999) Morton's meta-tarsalgia: sonographic findings and correlated histo-pathology. Foot Ankle Int 20:153-161

82. Sobiesk GA,Wertheimer SJ, Schulz R et al (1997) Sonographic evaluation of interdigital neuromas. J Foot Ankle Surg 36:364-366

83. Quinn TJ,Jacobson JA,Craig JG,van Holsbeeck MT (2000) Sonography of Morton's neuromas.AJR 174:1723-1728

84. Batz R, Sofka CM,Adler RS et al (2006) Dermatomyositis and calcific myonecrosis in the leg: ultrasound as an aid in management. Skeletal Radiol 35:113-116

85. Gibbon WW (2004) Applications of ultrasound in arthritis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 8:313-328

86. Inampudi P, Jacobson JA, Fessell DP et al (2004) Soft-tissue lipomas: accuracy of sonography in diagnosis with pathologic correlation. Radiology 233:763-767

87. Griffith JF,Wong TY,Wong SM et al (2002) Sonography of plantar fibromatosis.AJR 179:1167-1172

88. Teefey SA,Middleton WD,Boyer MI (2000) Sonography of the hand and wrist. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21:192-204

Pathological findings in rheumatic diseases

The ability of US to make an accurate evaluation of soft tissue involvement in a wide range of diseases of the locomotor system has led to its increasing widespread use in the field of rheumatology [1-10]. Significant technological progress has been made over the last few years, generating ever more sophisticated and reliable ultrasound machinery. The high resolution is now such that real in vivo histological examination is now possible. The main reason for the relative lack of wide diffusion of its use amongst rheumatologists is that a long training period is necessary in order to acquire full operator independence.

Initially, the use of US in rheumatology was limited to the identification of large collections of synovial fluid (popliteal cysts, bursitis) [11]. These collections can be easily identified even with 'first generation' US equipment that uses probes with frequencies between 3.5 and 5 MHz. These are, however, inappropriate for the study of superficial soft tissues. With the advent of the 'second generation' US machines, with 7.5 MHz linear probes, US can now explore larger joints. Clinical practice now includes the study of the shoulder, hip and knee has proven useful in the examination of large tendons (Achilles, long head of biceps and patellar tendon).

The potential applications of US in rheumatology have been further increased with the dawn of the 'third generation' US machines, equipped with very high-frequency probes (> 10 MHz). These can reach a spatial resolution of less than a tenth of a millimeter and make it possible to study the finest details of the smaller joints and hand tendons which are involved early on in chronic arthritis.

5.1 Osteoarthritis

Several sonographic abnormalities may be observed in patients with osteoarthritis. These include changes within cartilage, joint cavity widening resulting from fluid collection with or without synovial proliferation, and osteophytes [12-14].

Changes within cartilage

Loss of the thin, sharp contour of the superficial margin of the cartilaginous layer is one of the early features of osteoarthritis. US is exquisitely sensitive in detecting structural changes within different tissues and can reveal fibrillation and cleft formation in osteoarthritis (Fig. 5.1) [15].

Osteoarthritis. Supra-patellar transverse scan with knee in maximal flexion shows loss of the normal clarity of cartilage layer together with blurring of the superficial margin of the femoral condylar cartilage. f = femur

Increased echogenicity with patchy or diffuse loss of clarity may be seen even in patients without any other findings to indicate damage to the cartilage structure. These changes would seem to reflect structural alterations such as fibrillation of cartilage and cleft formation [13]. Particular attention should be paid to distinguish these early findings in osteoarthritis from artifacts caused by inaccurate setting (gain level) or probe position [16].

A slight increase in cartilage thickness caused by inflammatory edema in the early phases of osteoarthritis has been noted [13]. Variable narrowing of the cartilaginous layer is detectable in patients at a more advanced stage of the disease. Cartilage thinning may be focal, or extend along the entire cartilaginous layer (Fig. 5.2).

US measurement of femoral condyle articular cartilage thickness could be of practical benefit for an early diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Accurate quantification of cartilage thickness cannot always be obtained in patients with advanced osteoarthritis because of poor visualization of the cartilage-synovial space interface. Complete cartilage loss can be observed in advanced disease (Fig. 5.3) [12,13,17].

Supra-patellar scanning of weight-bearing areas can be difficult in patients with advanced osteoarthritis and/or painful knee, resulting in limited maximal active flexion [15-18]. Diagnostic accuracy in the detection and grading of cartilage abnormalities should be the subject of further research. The knee and the metacarpophalangeal joints are the locations in which US can best demonstrate the various evolutionary phases of cartilage involvement in osteoarthritis.

The articular cartilage of the metacarpal head can be evaluated by longitudinal and transverse dorsal scans, with the metacarpophalangeal joint held in maximal active flexion. Standard longitudinal dorsal and volar scans may also be useful.

Proximal and distal interphalangeal joints are generally evaluated by means of longitudinal and transverse dorsal scans with the finger in a neutral position. US with high frequency probes allows for an in-depth study of these joints, even if only a limited portion of the cartilage can be explored, due to the acoustic barriers (Fig. 5.4 a, b, c)

Joint effusion

Small to moderate joint effusions are commonly found in patients with osteoarthritis (Figs. 5.5, 5.6, 5.7). Minimal fluid collections that may be missed on clinical examination are easily detected by US. Synovial fluid is usually anechoic. Non-homogeneous echogenicity of synovial fluid and/or echogenic spots with or without acoustic shadowing can be generated by proteinaceous material, cartilage fragments, crystal aggregates and calcified loose bodies.

Osteoarthritis.Supra-patellar transverse scan with knee in maximal flexion demonstrates focal cartilage thinning (arrowhead) and marked irregularity of the subchondral bone. f = femur

Osteoarthritis.Supra-patellar transverse scan with knee in maximal flexion shows complete loss of cartilage. f = femur

Osteoarthritis.Supra-patellar transverse scan with knee in maximal flexion demonstrates focal cartilage thinning (arrowhead) and marked irregularity of the subchondral bone. f = femur

Osteoarthritis.Supra-patellar transverse scan with knee in maximal flexion shows complete loss of cartilage. f = femur




Was this article helpful?

0 0

Post a comment