a Includes mostly trace DNA samples.
a Includes mostly trace DNA samples.
The changing nature of the case submission profile in forensic molecular biology laboratories has been accompanied by a changing evidence type away from traditional templates such as blood and semen to more discrete evidence types such as trace DNA and discarded items (including drinking containers and cigarette butts). This is again illustrated in data from the NSW State Forensic DNA Laboratory from between 2001 and 2005 (Table 1.2).
As well as having a profound effect on the number and types of cases submitted for DNA analysis, forensic DNA databases have also catalysed a re-think of the role that forensic evidence can play in the investigative process. Traditionally forensic DNA evidence has been thought of as information for the use of the court. This focus sees the scientist retrospectively attempting to obtain results for a given case to assist in the resolution of a single crime. The primary focus, therefore, is towards crime-solving rather than crime reduction or prevention. For some years now, policing strategy has evolved from a traditional focus on capturing or incarcerating offenders towards a more holistic understanding of crimes and criminals and a prevention-based approach to law enforcement. Forensic science has not contributed greatly to changes in policing and crime management strategies, although lately there has been a move to embrace scientific advances under the concept of intelligence-led policing (Smith, 1997; Thompson and Gunn, 1998; Gunn, 2003; Tilley, 2003). Forensic molecular biology clearly has a role to play in the generation of law enforcement intelligence products (Walsh et al., 2002), particularly when one considers the potential of combining rapid, portable DNA typing with the use of DNA databases or phenotypic inferences about an offender. As such it has the potential to play a more proactive role in broader-scale crime investigation.
Achieving this requires shifting the philosophical mind-set of forensic practitioners, understanding where, when and how forensic science data can be useful in an intelligence context, and designing systems capable of relaying findings in 'real-time'. A number of approaches have begun to emerge that embrace this operational strategy. Some remain ill-informed and are based around centralized database creation. Other more successful examples create meaningful forensic intelligence and combine it with investigative and crime analysis tools (Ribaux and Margot, 1999, 2003).
In summary there has been a trend towards greater use of DNA, across a more diverse range of cases and in a more intelligence-based context or framework. It is important to note, however, that these developments (and the DNA databases that have predominantly catalysed them) remain at a preliminary stage. Standards and approaches still vary enormously between jurisdictions and in future there may be continued moves towards greater harmonization. Undoubtedly there will be progress towards greater cross-jurisdictional exchange of DNA information, possibly facilitated at the level of organizations such as Interpol. Managing this era of wider national and international use of forensic DNA profile information will be challenging as, through these developments, the science we apply moves increasingly into the public and political realm.
1.4 Developments influencing the justice system -socio-legal impacts
Practical and philosophical aspects of the legal system have been impacted by developments in the field of forensic molecular biology. Practical issues emanate from the construction of laws that regulate the collection of DNA material from persons associated with the justice system, and the subsequent use of any DNA-related evidence in our courts. These are flanked by important philosophical considerations in areas such as social justice, ethics and privacy.
From the time of its first introduction the courts have had mixed experiences with the presentation of forensic DNA evidence. Scientists, lawyers, judges and jurors have battled to come to terms with this new forensic application of a complex scientific technique. Initially complicating matters further was the public fanfare that accompanied early DNA successes, creating an aura of scientific certainty around the technology. Whilst forensic molecular biology is a powerful means of identification, this sort of misrepresentation in the public arena can create unrealistic perceptions of its capability. At a relatively early stage, the admissibility of DNA evidence in criminal trials was successfully challenged in the United States (People v Castro, 1989, 545 NYS 2d 985) and elsewhere (R v Tran, 1990, 50 A Crim R 233; R v Lucas, 1992, 2 VR 109; R v Pengelly, 1992, 1 NZLR 545). Many of the issues upon which early challenges were mounted were the subject of conflict in the scientific community at the time (Lander, 1989; Chakraborty and Kidd, 1991; Lewontin and Hartl, 1991). The scrutiny of the legal system in these instances must be seen to have been strongly positive as it brought about further refinement and validation of the forensic DNA methodology and the implementation of structures to regulate quality assurance. In recent times challenges to DNA admissibility are rarely successful, as, in general terms, the science has reached the important point of being accepted practice. This is not to say that legal scrutiny has abated entirely, rather, if anything, legal challenges have evolved in their complexity along with the evolution of the technology itself. Instead of focusing on general issues, it is now specialized components of the analytical or interpretative process that have become the subject of questioning.
Widening the use of forensic DNA evidence and implementing forensic DNA databases have required the formulation of specific statutes. The enactment of the DNA-based laws has generated considerable commentary in the legal literature regarding the process of enactment and the final constitution of the laws themselves. In most cases the legal discussion is critical, suggesting that the passage of legislation was hurried and justified under the populist appeal of 'law and order' politics. Others fear that compulsory acquisition of genetic material by the state represents an encroachment into previously sacred territory of criminal law and a diminution of basic rights such as the right to silence and the right against self-incrimination. Many commentators express concern over the mass storage of human genetic information and the associated potential risk of future misuse.
Overall, the practical developments at the intersection of forensic molecular biology and the legal system have progressed from general issues (such as whether DNA testing has a place in the CJS at all) to specific refinements (such as how DNA evidence was obtained and tested). Again it is important to note that this period of interplay between the science of DNA testing and the regulation of legal sector is a relatively recent phenomenon and is bound to evolve considerably, even in the short term. The balance that is sought relates to attempting to achieve maximal effectiveness from the use of DNA, whilst minimizing the incursion into a person's basic civil and legal rights. In different cases, different countries and at different times striking this balance can be influenced by external pressures. Recently, for example, heightened anxiety around terrorism has seen governments override individual rights in favor of more expansive investigative powers. The use of forensic molecular biology is linked to many of these broad socio-legal issues.
The field of forensic molecular biology has entered a period of development where more genetically diverse applications are emerging and are able to be delivered by a more responsive and technically advanced platform. There is also an emphasis for forensic DNA outcomes to be delivered as intelligence products as well as evidence for the court. This allows it to take on a more purposeful role in the investigative phase of the process alongside other items of forensic or non-forensic intelligence. Understandably, these enhancements in capability are continuing to drive a great demand to access and utilize this technology. So far this demand has, in many cases, outstripped the ability of forensic laboratories to cope, and case backlogs are commonplace in many jurisdictions.
These trends signal the beginning of an exciting era for forensic molecular biology. As forensic professionals, however, we must remember that adding these dimensions to our capability also adds to our overall onus of responsibility. Such changes require a continual broadening of our outlook and expertise. Also, due to the emotional and social stakes that exist in the criminal justice system, many developments in our field are somewhat double-edged: able to be viewed either positively as strengthening our ability to fight against crime or terrorism or negatively as examples of an increasing loss of civil liberties and greater surveillance by the state on her citizens. Whilst forensic scientists remain impartial players in this environment, it is important that we do not extricate ourselves from this debate that essentially defines how and to what end our scientific endeavour is applied. Of paramount importance is that, across all techniques within our field, we continue to ensure the quality of our scientific outcomes. By doing this our work will remain an objective and reliable component of the criminal justice system.
Abaz, J., Walsh, S.J., Curran, J.M., Moss, D.S., Cullen, J.R., Bright, J., Crowe, G.A., Cockerton, S.L. and Power, T.E.B. (2002) Comparison of variables affecting the recovery of DNA from common drinking containers. Forensic Sci. Int. 126: 233-240.
Aitken, C.G.G. and Taroni, F. (2004) Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for
Forensic Scientists (2nd edn), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. Aitken, C.G.G., Taroni, F. and Garbolino, P. (2003) A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles. Theor. Pop. Biol. 63: 179-190. Andelinovic, S., Sutlovic, D., Erceg Ivkosic, I., Skaro, V., Ivkosic, A., Paic, F., Rezic, B., Definis-Gojanovic, M. and Primorac, D. (2005) Twelve-year experience in identification of skeletal remains from mass graves. Croat. Med. J. 46: 530-539. Anderson, T.D., Ross, J.P., Roby, R.K., Lee, D.A. and Holland, M.M. (1999) A validation study for the extraction and analysis of DNA from human nail material and its application to forensic casework. J. Forensic Sci. 44: 1053-1056. Ayres, K.L. (2000) Relatedness testing in subdivided populations. Forensic Sci. Int. 114: 107-115.
Balding, D.J. (2002) The DNA database search controversy. Biometrics 58: 241-244. Balding, D.J. (2005) Weight-of-Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles, John Wiley & Sons,
Hoboken, New Jersey. Bender, K., Schneider, P.M. and Rittner, C. (2000) Application of mtDNA sequence analysis in forensic casework for the identification of human remains. Forensic Sci. Int. 113: 103-107.
Bill, M., Gill, P., Curran, J.M., Clayton, T., Pinchin, R., Healy, M. and Buckleton, J.S. (2005) PENDULUM - a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures. Forensic Sci. Int. 148: 181-189.
Bosch, E., Lee, A.C., Calafell, F., Arroyo, E., Henneman, P., de Knijff, P. and Jobling, M.A. (2002) High resolution Y chromsome typing: 19 STRs amplified in three multiplex reactions. Forensic Sci. Int. 125: 42-51.
Branicki, W., Kupiec, T., Wolanska-Nowak, P. and Brudnik, U. (2006) Determination of forensically relevant SNPs in the MC1R gene. Int. Congr. Ser. 1288: 816-818.
Brenner, C.H. (2006) Some mathematical problems in the DNA identification of victims in the 2004 tsunami and similar mass fatalities. Forensic Sci. Int. 157: 172-180.
Brenner, C.H. and Weir, B.S. (2003) Issues and strategies in the DNA identification of World Trade Center victims. Theor. Pop. Biol. 63: 173-178.
Bright, J.A. and Petricevic, S.F. (2004) Recovery of trace DNA and its application to DNA profiling of shoe insoles. Forensic Sci. Int. 145: 7-12.
Brion, M., Sanchez, J.J., Balogh, K., Thacker, C., Blanco-Verea, A., Borsting, C., Stradmann-Bellinghausen, B., Bogus, M., Syndercombe-Court, D., Schneider, P.M., Carracedo, A. and Morling, N. (2005) Introduction of an single nucleodite polymorphism-based 'Major Y-chromosome haplogroup typing kit' suitable for predicting the geographical origin of male lineages. Electrophoresis 26: 4411-4420.
Brion, M., Sobrino, B., Blanco-Verea, A., Lareu, M.V. and Carracedo, A. (2004) Hierachical analysis of 30 Y-chromosome SNPs in European populations. Int. J. Legal Med. 119: 10-15.
Buckleton, J.S. and Triggs, C.M. (2005) Relatedness and DNA: are we taking it seriously enough? Forensic Sci. Int. 152: 115-119.
Buckleton, J.S. and Triggs, C.M. (2006) Is the 2p rule always conservative? Forensic Sci. Int. 159: 206-209.
Buckleton, J.S., Triggs, C.M. and Walsh, S.J. (2005a) Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Buckleton, J.S., Walsh, S.J. and Harbison, S.A. (2005b) Nonautosomal forensic markers. In: Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation (J.S. Buckleton, C.M. Triggs and S.J. Walsh, eds), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 299-339.
Budjimila, Z.M., Prinz, M.K., Zelson-Mundorff, A., Wiersema, J., Bartelink, E., MacKinnon, G., Nazzaruolo, B.L., Estacio, S.M., Hennessey, M.J. and Shaler, R.C. (2003) World Trade Center human identification project: experiences with individual body identification cases. Croat. Med. J. 44: 259-263.
Budowle, B., Bieber, F.R. and Eisenberg, A.J. (2005) Forensic aspects of mass disasters: strategic considerations for DNA-based human identification. Legal Med. 7: 230245.
Budowle, B., Planz, J.V., Campbell, R.S. and Eisenberg, A.J. (2004) Single nucleotide polymorphisms and microarray technology in forensic genetics - development and application to mitochondrial DNA. Forensic Sci. Rev. 16: 21-36.
Butler, J.M., Li, J., Shaler, T.A., Monforte, J.A. and Becker, C.H. (1998) Reliable geno-typing of short tandem repeat loci without an alleleic ladder using time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Int. J. Legal Med. 112: 45-49.
Butler, J.M., Schoske, R., Vallone, P.M., Kline, M.C., Redd, A.J. and Hammer, M.F. (2002) A novel multiplex for simultaneous amplification of 20 Y chromosome STR markers. Forensic Sci. Int. 129: 10-24.
Butler, J.M., Shen, Y. and McCord, B.R. (2003) The development of reduced size STR amplicons as tools for analysis of degraded DNA. J. Forensic Sci. 48: 1054-1064.
Cann, R.L., Stoneking, M. and Wilson, A.C. (1987) Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature 325: 31-36.
Chakraborty, R. and Kidd, K.K. (1991) The utility of DNA typing in forensic work. Science 254: 1735-1744.
Coble, M.D. and Butler, J.M. (2005) Characterization of new miniSTR loci to aid analysis of degraded DNA. J. Forensic Sci. 50: 43-53.
Coble, M.D., Just, R.S., O'Callaghan, J.E., Letmanyi, I.H., Peterson, C.T., Irwin, J.A. and Parsons, T.J. (2004) Single nucleotide polymorphisms over the entire mtDNA genome that increase the power of forensic testing in Caucasians. Int. J. Legal Med. 118: 137-146.
Collins, P., Roby, R.K., Lori, H., Leibelt, C., Shadravan, F., Bozzini, M.L. and Reeder, D. (2000) Validation of the AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR amplification kit. In Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Human Identification, Billoxi, Missouri, September 2000. Available at http://www.promega.com/geneticidproc/ussymp11proc/ content/collins.pdf
Curran, J.M., Triggs, C.M., Buckleton, J.S. and Weir, B.S. (1999) Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations. J. Forensic Sci. 44: 987-995.
Dettlaff-Kakol, A. and Pawlowski, R. (2002) The first Polish DNA 'manhumnt' - an application of Y-chromosome STR's. Int. J. Legal Med. 116: 289-291.
Dixon, L.A., Koumi, P. and Gill, P. (2006) Development of an autosomal SNP multiplex containing 20 SNP loci plus amelogenin. Int. Congr. Ser. 1288: 31-33.
Dziegelewski, M., Simich, J.P. and Rittenhouse-Olsen, K. (2002) Use of a Y chromosome probe as an aid in the forensic proof of sexual assault. J. Forensic Sci. 47: 601-604.
Edson, S.M., Ross, J.P., Coble, M.D., Parsons, T.J. and Barritt, S.M. (2004) Naming the dead - confronting the realities of rapid identification of degraded skeletal remains. Forensic Sci. Rev. 16: 63-90.
Evett, I.W. and Weir, B.S. (1998) Interpreting DNA Evidence, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Fregeau, C.J., Leclair, B., Bowen, K., Porelle, F. and Fourney, R.M. (2003) The National DNA Data Bank of Canada - a laboratory bench retrospective on the first year of operation. Int. Congr. Ser. 1239: 621-625.
Frudakis, T., Thomas, M., Gaskin, Z., Venkateswarlu, K., Chandra, K., Ginjupalli, S., Gunturi, S., Natrajan, S., Ponnuswamy, V. and Ponnuswamy, K. (2003a) Sequences associated with human iris pigmentation. Genetics 165: 2071-2083.
Frudakis, T., Venkateswarlu, K., Thomas, M.J., Gaskin, Z., Ginjupalli, S., Gunturi, S., Ponnuswamy, V., Natarajan, S. and Nachimuthu, P.K. (2003b) A classifier for the SNP-based inference of ancestry. J. Forensic Sci. 48: 771-782.
Fukshansky, N. and Bar, W. (2000) Biostatisitcs for mixed stains: the case of tested relatives of a non-tested suspect. Int. J. Legal Med. 114: 78-82.
Fukshansky, N. and Bar, W. (2005) DNA mixtures: biostatistics for mixed stains with haplotypic genetic markers. Int. J. Legal Med. 119: 285-290.
Gill, P. (2001a) Application of low copy number DNA profiling. Croat. Med. J. 42: 229-232.
Gill, P. (2001b) An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for forensic purposes. Int. J. Legal Med. 114: 204-210.
Gill, P. (2002) Role of short tandem repeat DNA in forensic casework in the UK - past, present and future perspectives. BioTechniques 32: 366-385.
Gill, P., Brenner, C., Brinkmann, B., Budowle, B., Carracedo, A., Jobling, M.A., de Knijff, P., Kayser, M., Krawczak, M., Mayr, W.R., Morling, N., Olaisen, B.,
Pascali, V., Prinz, M., Roewer, L., Schneider, P.M., Sajantila, A. and Tyler-Smith, C. (2001) DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on forensic analysis using Y-chromosome STRs. Forensic Sci. Int. 124: 5-10.
Gill, P., Brenner, C.H., Buckleton, J.S., Carracedo, A., Krawczak, M., Mayr, W.R., Morling, N., Prinz, M., Schneider, P.M. and Weir, B.S. (2006a) DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. Forensic Sci. Int. 160: 90-101.
Gill, P., Curran, J.M. and Elliot, K. (2005) A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA process associated with the analysis of short tandem repeat loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 632-643.
Gill, P., Ivanov, P.L., Kimpton, C., Piercy, R., Benson, N., Tully, G., Evett, I.W., Hagelberg, E. and Sullivan, K. (1994) Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis. Nature Genet. 6: 130-135.
Gill, P., Kirkham, A. and Curran, J.M. (2006b) LoComatioN: A software tool for the analysis of low copy number profiles. Forensic Sci. Int. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.04.016.
Gill, P., Werrett, D.J., Budowle, B. and Guerrieri, R.A. (2004) An assessment of whether SNPs will replace STRs in national DNA databases - Joint considerations of the DNA working group of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) and the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM). Sci. Justice 44: 51-53.
Gill, P., Whitaker, J.P., Flaxman, C., Brown, N. and Buckleton, J.S. (2000) An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STR's derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci. Int. 112: 17-40.
Grimes, E.A., Noakes, P.J., Dixon, L. and Urquhart, A. (2001) Sequence polymorphism in the human melanocortin 1 receptor gene as an indicator of the red hair phenotype. Forensic Sci. Int. 122: 124-129.
Gunn, B. (2003) An intelligence-led approach to policing in England and Wales and the impact of developments in forensic science. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 35: 149-160.
Gusmao, L., Butler, J.M., Carracedo, A., Gill, P., Kayser, M., Mayr, W.R., Morling, N., Prinz, M., Roewer, L., Tyler-Smith, C. and Schneider, P.M. (2006) DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): An update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 157: 187-197.
Gusmao, L. and Carracedo, A. (2003) Y chromosome-specific STRs. Profiles DNA 5: 3-6.
Hall, A. and Ballantyne, J. (2003) The development of an 18-locus Y-STR system for forensic casework. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 376: 1234-1246.
Hanson, E.K. and Ballantyne, J. (2004) A highly discriminating 21 locus 'megaplex' system designed to augment the minimal haplotype loci for forensic casework. J. Forensic Sci. 49: 40-51.
Harbison, S.A., Petricevic, S.F. and Vintiner, S.K. (2003) The persistence of DNA under fingernails following submersion in water. Int. Congr. Ser. 1239: 809-813.
Holland, M.M., Cave, C.A., Holland, C.A. and Bille, T.W. (2003) Development of a quality, high throughput DNA analysis procedure for skeletal samples to assist with the identification of victims from the world trade center attacks. Croat. Med. J. 44: 264-272.
Hopwood, A., Fox, R., Round, C., Tsang, C., Watson, S., Rowlands, E., Titmus, A., Lee-Edghill, J., Cursiter, L., Proudlock, J., McTernan, C., Grigg, K., Thornton, L. and Kimpton, C. (2006) Forensic response vehicle: Rapid analysis of evidence at the crime scene. Int. Congr. Ser. 1288: 639-641.
Huffine, E., Crews, J., Kennedy, B., Bomberger, K. and Zinbo, A. (2001) Mass identification of persons missing from the break-up of the former Yugoslavia: structure, function, and role of International Commission on Missing Persons. Croat. Med. J. 42: 271-275.
Inagaki, S., Yamamoto, Y., Doi, Y., Takata, T., Ishikawa, T., Imabayashi, K., Yoshitome, K., Miyaishi, S. and Ishizu, H. (2004) A new 39-plex analysis method for SNPs including 15 blood group loci. Forensic Sci. Int. 144: 45-57.
Ivanov, P.L., Wadhams, M.J., Roby, R.K., Holland, M.M., Weedn, V.W. and Parsons, T.J. (1996) Mitochondrial DNA sequence heteroplasmy in the Grand Duke of Russia Georgij Romanov establishes the authenticity of the remains of Tsar Nicholas II. Nature Genet. 12: 417-420.
Jobling, M.A., Hurles, M.E. and Tyler-Smith, C. (2004) Human Evolutionary Genetics, Garland Science, New York.
Jobling, M.A., Pandya, A. and Tyler-Smith, C. (1997) The Y chromosome in forensic analysis and paternity testing. Int. J. Legal Med. 110: 118-124.
Jobling, M.A. and Tyler-Smith, C. (2003) The human Y chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age. Nature Rev. Genet. 4: 598-612.
Johnson, C.L., Warren, J.H., Giles, R.C. and Staub, R.W. (2003) Validation and uses of a Y-chromosome STR 10-plex for forensic and paternity laboratories. J. Forensic Sci. 48: 1260-1268.
Kayser, M., Caglia, A., Corach, D., Fretwell, N., Gehrig, C., Graziosi, G., Heidorn, F., Herrmann, S., Herzog, B., Hidding, M., Honda, K., Jobling, M.A., Krawczak, M., Leim, K., Meuser, S., Meyer, E., Oesterreich, W., Pandya, A., Parson, W., Penacino, G., Perez-Lezaun, A., Piccinini, A., Prinz, M., Schmitt, C., Schneider, P.M., Szibor, R., Teifel-Greding, J., Weichhold, G., de Knijff, P. and Roewer, L. (1997) Evaluation of Y-chromosomal STRs: a multicenter study. Int. J. Legal Med. 110: 125-133.
Kidd, K.K., Pakstis, A.J., Speed, W.C., Grigorenko, E.L., Kajuna, S.L.B., Karoma, N.J., Kungulilo, S., Kim, J.-J., Lu, R.-B., Odunsi, A., Okonofua, F., Parnas, J., Schulz, L.O., Zhukova, O.V. and Kidd, J.R. (2006) Developing a SNP panel for forensic identification of individuals. Forensic Sci. Int. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1016/j. forscient.2006.04.016.
Krawczak, M. (2001) Forensic evaluation of Y-STR haplotype matches: a comment. Forensic Sci. Int. 118: 114-115.
Krenke, B., Tereba, A., Anderson, S.J., Buel, E., Culhane, S., Finis, C.J., Tomsey, C.S., Zachetti, J.M., Masibay, A., Rabbach, D.R., Amiott, E.A. and Sprecher, C.J. (2002) Validation of a 16-locus fluorescent multiplex system. J. Forensic Sci. 47: 773-785.
Krenke, B.E., Viculis, L., Richard, M.L., Prinz, M., Milne, S.C., Ladd, C., Gross, A.M., Gornall, T., Frappier, J.R., Eisenberg, A.J., Barna, C., Aranda, X.G., Adamowicz, M.S. and Budowle, B. (2005) Validation of male-specific, 12-locus fluorescent short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex. Forensic Sci. Int. 151: 111-124.
Lander, E.S. (1989) DNA fingerprinting on trial. Nature 339: 501.
Lewontin, R.C. and Hartl, D.L. (1991) Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. Science 254: 1745-1750.
Lorente, J.A., Entrala, C., Alvarez, J.C., Lorente, M., Arce, B., Heinrich, B., Carrasco, F., Budowle, B. and Villanueva, E. (2002) Social benefits on non-criminal genetic databases: missing persons and human remains identification. Int. J. Legal Med. 116: 187-190.
Lorente, M., Entrala, C., Lorente, J., Alvarez, J.C., Villanueva, E. and Budowle, B. (1998) Dandruff as a potential source of DNA in forensic casework. J. Forensic Sci. 43: 648-656.
Mitnik, L., Carey, L., Burger, R., Desmarais, S., Koutny, L., Wernet, O., Matsudaira, P. and Ehrlich, D. (2002) High-speed analysis of multiplexed short tandem repeats with and electrophoretic microdevice. Electrophoresis 23: 719-726.
Mulero, J.J., Chang, C.W., Calandro, L.M., Green, R.L., Li, Y., Johnson, C.L. and Hennessy, L.K. (2006) Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR Yfiler PCR amplification kit: a male specific, single amplification 17 Y-STR multiplex system. J. Forensic Sci. 51: 64-75.
National Academy of Sciences (1996) National Research Council Report: The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence, United States National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Perlin, M.W. and Szabady, B. (2001) Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples. J. Forensic Sci. 46: 1372-1378.
Pfeiffer, H., Benthaus, S., Rolf, B. and Brinkmann, B. (2003) The Kaiser's tooth. Int. J. Legal Med. 117: 118-120.
Quintans, B., Alvarez-Iglesias, V., Salas, A., Phillips, C., Lareu, M.V. and Carracedo, A. (2004) Typing of mitochondrial DNA coding region SNPs of forensic and anthropological interest using SNaPshot minisequencing. Forensic Sci. Int. 140: 251-257.
Redd, A.J., Agellon, A.B., Kearney, V.A., Contreras, V.A., Karafet, T., Park, H., de Knijff, P., Butler, J.M. and Hammer, M.F. (2002) Forensic value of 14 novel STRs on the human Y chromosome. Forensic Sci. Int. 130: 97-111.
Ribaux, O. and Margot, P. (1999) Inference structures for crime analysis and intelligence: the example of burglary using forensic science data. Forensic Sci. Int. 100: 193-210.
Ribaux, O. and Margot, P. (2003) Case based reasoning in criminal intelligence using forensic case data. Sci. Justice 43: 135-143.
Robertson, B. and Vignaux, G.A. (1995) Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Roby, R.K. (2002) Automation for forensic mitochondrial DNA analysis. In Proceedings of 5th Annual DNA Forensics Conference, Washington, DC.
Sanchez, J.J., Borsting, C., Hallenberg, C., Buchard, A., Hernandez, A. and Morling, N. (2003) Multiplex PCR and minisequencing of SNPs - a model with 35 Y chromosome SNPs. Forensic Sci. Int. 137: 74-84.
Sanchez, J.J., Borsting, C. and Morling, N. (2005) Typing of Y chromosome SNPs with multiplex PCR methods. Methods Mol. Biol. 297: 209-228.
Sanchez, J.J., Phillips, C., Borsting, C., Balogh, K., Bogus, M., Fondevila, M., Harrison, C.D., Musgrave-Brown, E., Salas, A., Syndercombe-Court, D., Schneider, P.M., Carracedo, A. and Morling, N. (2006) A multiplex assay with 52 single nucleotide polymorphisms for human identification. Electrophoresis 27: 1713-1724.
Schoske, R., Vallone, P.M., Kline, M.C., Redman, J.W. and Butler, J.M. (2004) High-throughput Y-STR typing of U.S. populations with 27 regions of the Y chromosome using two multiplex PCR assays. Forensic Sci. Int. 139: 107-121.
Shewale, J.G., Nasir, H., Schneida, E., Gross, A.M., Budowle, B. and Sinha, S.K. (2004) Y-chromosome STR system, Y-PLEX™ 12, for forensic casework: development and validation. J. Forensic Sci. 49: 1278-1290.
Sibille, I., Duverneuil, C., Lorin de la Grandmaison, G., Guerrouache, K., Teisiere, F., Durigon, M. and de Mazancourt, P. (2002) Y-STR DNA amplification as biological evidence in sexually assaulted female victims with no cytological detection of spermatozoa. Forensic Sei. Int. 125: 212-216.
Smith, A. (1997) Intelligence Led Policing; International Perspectives on Policing in the 21st Century, International Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Analysts, Lawrenceville, CA.
Sturm, R. and Frudakis, T. (2004) Eye colour: portals into pigmentation genes and ancestry. Trends Genet. 20: 327-332.
Sweet, D. and Hildebrand, D. (1999) Saliva from cheese bite yields DNA profile of a burglar: a case report. Int. J. Legal Med. 112: 201-203.
Thompson, J. and Gunn, B. (1998) Tomorrow's world. Policing Today 4: 12-13.
Tilley, N. (2003) Problem-Oriented Policing, Intelligence-Led Policing and the National Intelligence Model, Report of the Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, Crime Science: Short Report Series, University College London, UK.
Tully, G., Bär, W., Brinkmann, B., Carracedo, A., Gill, P., Morling, N., Parson, W. and Schneider, P.M. (2001) Considerations of the European DNA Profiling (EDNAP) group on the working practices, nomenclature and interpretation of mitochondrial DNA profiles. Forensic Sci. Int. 124: 83-91.
Underhill, P.A., Passarino, G., Lin, A.A., Shen, P., Mirazon Lahr, M., Foley, R.A., Oefner, P.J. and Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. (2001) The phylogeography of Y chromosome binary haplotypes and the origins of modern human populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 65: 43-62.
Underhill, P.A., Shen, P., Lin, A.A., Jin, L., Passarino, G., Yang, W.-H., Kauffman, E., Bonne-Tamir, B., Bertranpetit, J., Francalacci, P., Ibrahim, M., Jenkins, T., Kidd, J.R., Medhi, S.Q., Seielstad, M.T., Wells, R.S., Piazza, A., Feldman, M.W., Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. and Oefner, P.J. (2000) Y chromosome sequence variation and the history of human populations. Nature Genet. 26: 358-361.
Van Oorschot, R.A. and Jones, M. (1997) DNA fingerprints from fingerprints. Nature 387: 767.
Varlaro, J. and Duceman, B. (2002) Dealing with increasing casework demands for DNA analysis. Profiles DNA 5: 3-6.
Vastag, B. (2002) Out of tragedy, identification innovation. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288: 1221-1223.
Walsh, S.J. and Buckleton, J.S. (2005) DNA intelligence databases. In: Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation, (J.S. Buckleton, C.M. Triggs, and S.J. Walsh, eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 439-469.
Walsh, S.J., Moss, D.S., Kleim, C. and Vintiner, G.M. (2002) The collation of forensic DNA case data into a multi-dimensional intelligence database. Sci. Justice 42: 205-214.
Webb, L.G., Egan, S.E. and Turbett, G.R. (2001) Recovery of DNA for forensic analysis from lip cosmetics. J. Forensic Sci. 46: 1474-1479.
Weir, B.S., Triggs, C.M., Starling, L., Stowell, L.I., Walsh, K.A.J. and Buckleton, J.S. (1997) Interpreting DNA mixtures. J. Forensic Sci. 42: 213-222.
Whitaker, J.P., Cotton, E.A. and Gill, P. (2001) A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR®SGM Plus™ multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 123: 215-223.
Wiegand, P. and Kleiber, M. (1997) DNA typing of epithelial cells after strangulation. Int. J. Legal Med. 110: 181-183.
Wiegand, P. and Kleiber, M. (2001) Less is more - length reduction of STR amplicons using redesigned primers. Int. J. Legal Med. 114: 285-287.
Wilson, M.R. and Allard, M.W. (2004) Phylogentics and mitochondrial DNA. Forensic Sci. Rev. 16: 37-62.
Wilson, M.R., Polanskey, D., Butler, J.M., DiZinno, J.A., Replogle, J. and Budowle, B. (1995) Extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing of mitochondrial DNA from human hair shafts. BioTechniques 18: 662-669.
Wolf, A., Caliebe, A., Junge, O. and Krawczak, M. (2005) Forensic interpretation of Y-chromosomal DNA mixtures. Forensic Sci. Int. 152: 209-213.
Woolley, A.T., Sensabaugh, G.F. and Mathies, R.A. (1997) High-speed DNA genotyping using microfabricated capillary array electrophoresis chips. Anal. Chem. 69: 21812186.
YCC. (2002) A nomenclature system for the tree of human Y chromosomal binary haplogroups. Genome Res. 12: 339-348.
Zamir, A., Springer, E. and Glattstein, B. (2000) Fingerprints and DNA: STR typing of DNA extracted from adhesive tape after processing for fingerprints. J. Forensic Sci. 45: 687-688.
Was this article helpful?